Thermal Processes and Air Distribution in the Engine Room of a High-voltage Sewage Pumping Station
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24160/1993-6982-2025-4-94-103Keywords:
pumping station, engine room, thermally stressed room, heat transfer processes, air exchange processes, air flow, waste water, ventilation system, convective jetAbstract
The article presents an overview of current studies aimed at improving the energy efficiency of wastewater disposal systems in populated areas located under various climatic conditions. Some features of the microclimate conditions in the engine room of a high-voltage municipal sewage pumping station for the cold and warm periods of the year are highlighted. A balance mathematical model is presented that describes thermal phenomena within the engine room of the structure considered for the cold period of the year. The air temperatures in the characteristic zones are determined. The compiled system of equations is solved using the Cramer method. The results from experimental studies of hourly averaged temperature values in the main working zones of the sewage pumping station engine room are presented. It has been determined in the course of experimental studies in the cold period of the year that that the average difference between the average hourly temperatures in working zones I and II is 5°C. The results obtained using the mathematical model were compared with those obtained in a full-scale experiment. The maximum mismatch between the results obtained using the mathematical model and the full-scale experiment for the two working zones considered was found to be 9.7%. The work is of interest for the services operating the sewerage systems of populated areas.
References
1. Short M.D., Daikeler A., Wallis K., Peirson W.L., Peters G.M. Dissolved Methane in the Influent of Three Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants Fed by Gravity Sewers // Sci. Total Environment. 2017. V. 599. Pp. 85—93.
2. Matos R.V., Ferreira F., Gil C., Matos J.S. Understanding the Effect of Ventilation, Intermittent Pumping and Seasonality in Hydrogen Sulfide and Methane Concentrations in a Coastal Sewerage System // Environmental Sci. and Pollution Research. 2019. V. 26(4). Pp. 3404—3414.
3. Hamer G., Levi B., Lynch D., Wotten M., Mountford K. Brooklyn Trunk Sewer Long Term Investment Plan // Odors and Air Pollutants. 2023. Proc. of Water Environment Federation Conf. 2023.
4. Yang Z., Zhu D.Z., Yu T., Edwin-Bonsu S., Liu Y. Case Study of Sulfide Generation and Emission in Sanitary Sewer with Drop Structures and Pumping Station // Water Sci. and Technol. 2019. V. 79(9). Pp. 1685—1694.
5. Jia M., Zhang J., Xu Y. Optimization Design if Industrial Water Supply Pump Station Considering the Influence of Atmospheric Temperature on Operation Cost // IEEE Access. 2020. V. 8. Pp. 161702—161712.
6. Kruglikova A.V. Influence of Climate on the Operation of Sewage Treatment Facilities in Novosibirsk // Water and Ecology. 2020. V. 82(2). Pp. 37—44.
7. Ponizovskiy A., Gosteev S., Kuzhel O. The Study of Low Temperature Plasma of Pulse Discharge in Relation to Air Cleaning Units // J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2017. V. 927. P. 012043.
8. Weng L. e. a. Application Research of Pulsed Plasma Discharge Combined Technology for the Treatment of Malodorous Gas in Sewage Pumping Station // Proc. III Power System and Green Energy Conf. 2023. Pp. 889—894.
9. Möller E., Pensler T., Thamsen P.U. Effect of Speed Variation on Clogging of Sewage Pumps // American Soc. Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting N.-Y., 2021. V. 2. P. V002T00A001.
10. Rinas M., Tränckner J., Koegst T. Sedimentation of Raw Sewage: Investigations for a Pumping Station in Northern Germany under Energy-efficient Pump Control // Water. 2018. V. 11(1). P. 40.
11. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Predictive Control of a Variable-speed Multi-pump Motor Drive // IEEE Intern. Symp. Industrial Electronics. 2014. Pp. 1409—1414.
12. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Optimization of Method of Adjustment of Productivity of Multi-pump System Containing Directly Connected Motors // Proc. IX Intern. Electric Power Quality and Supply Reliability Conf. 2014. Pp. 209—214.
13. Bakman I., Gevorkov L. Speed Control Strategy Selection For Multi-Pump Systems // Proc. 56th Intern. Sci. Conf. Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Techn. University. 2015. P. 7343174.
14. Burian S.O. e. a. Energy-efficient Control of Pump Units Based on Neural-network Parameter Observer // Techn. Electrodynamics. 2020. V. 1. Pp. 71—77.
15. Heckman E.L., Schafer P.L., Wolstenholme P., Pustorino R.E., Varma A. Pumping Station Design. N.-Y.: Elsevier, 2008. Pp. 23.1—23.5.
16. Masud M.F., Chattopadhyay G., Gunawan I. Development of a Risk-based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for Sewage Pumping Station Network // Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. Industrial Eng. and Engineering Management. 2019. Pp. 455—458.
17. Gromov G.N., Primin O.G. Use of Genetic Algorithms for Calibration of Hydraulic Models of Water Supply Systems // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 456. P. 012108.
18. Chennaif M. e. a. Autonomous Solar Photovoltaic/battery System for the Electrification of Wastewater Pumping Stations // Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2023. V. 954. Pp. 861—872.
19. Chennaif M., Zahboune H., Elhafyani M.L., Zouggar S. Techno-economic Sizing of a Stand-alone Hybrid Energy and Storage for Water Pumping System // Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2019. V. 684. Pp. 291—299.
20. Venkatesh G. Systems Performance Analysis of Oslo's Water and Wastewater System. Trondheim, 2011.
21. Biktasheva L.F., Vadulina N.V. Development of the Methodology for a Biological Factor Assessment Considering Occupational Risks (Using the Example of Employees of the Treatment Plants) // Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. V. 4. Pp. 83—86.
22. Alikbayeva L.A. e. a. Hygienic Assessment of Conditions of the Exploitation of Facilities of the Urban Drainage System // Hygiene and Sanitation. 2016. V. 95(12). Pp. 1121—1124.
23. Khavanov P., Volkov V. Ensuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Friendliness of the Ventilation Systems with Baths Wastewater Treatment // Intern. Multi-Conf. Industrial Eng. and Modern Technol. 2019. P. 8934406.
24. Oblienko A.V., Potapova S.O., Sushko E.A. Experimental Investigation of Explosive and Flammable Substances Distribution in Industrial Premises // Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2010. V. 19(3). Pp. 154—163.
25. Dement’eva M.E., Kurokhtin A.A. Features of Operation of Sewage Pumping Stations of Heat and Power Stations in Conditions the Far North // Proc. Moscow State University of Civil Engi. 2019. V. 126(3). Pp. 356—366.
26. Razakov M. Features of Providing Air Temperature and Humidity Parameters in the Engine Room Working Area at Sewage Pumping Stations // Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2024. V. 2(74). Pp. 28—39.
27. Prokhorov V., Rymarov A., Razakov M., Kosarev A. Specialized Method of Calculating Heat Input from Wastewater in the Premises of the Sewage Pumping Stations // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 463(3). P. 032073.
28. Starkova L.G., Datsuk T.A., Ulyasheva V.M. Numerical Simulation of Aeration in a Hot Rolling Workshop // Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022. V. 94(5). Pp. 76—82.
29. Tabunshchikov I.A., Kolubkov A.N., Brodach M.M., Avakian I.S. Calculating Airflow Rates, Cooling Loads in Commercial Kitchens // ASHRAE J. 2020. V. 62(9). Pp. 48—50.
30. Grimitlin A.M., Strongin A.S. Assessment of the Efficiency of the Use of Activating Turbulent Jets to Eliminate the Risk of the Formation of Unventilated Zones in Large Premises // J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2021. V. 2131(1). P. 052068.
31. Kostin V.I., Pozin G.M., Khomlyaskiy A.B. An Approximate Mathematical Model of Thermal and Air Processes in Power Plants Engine Rooms // News of Universities. Building and Architecture Ser. 1985. V. 12. Pp. 83—86.
32. Sargsyan S., Zhila V. Mathematical Modeling of the Indoor Ice Arena with Two Control Volumes for Calculation of the Air Exchange // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 365(2). P. 022059.
33. Tabunshchikov Yu.A., Brodach M.M. Optimization Problems of Mathematical Modelling of a Building as a Unified Heat and Power System // Intern. J. Computational Civil and Structural Eng. 2020. V. 16(1). Pp. 156—161.
34. Titkov D., Yarkov I. A Mathematical Model for the Calculation of the Thermal Regime of the Underground Tunnel // Matec Web of Conf. 2018. V. 251. P. 03009.
---
Для цитирования: Разаков М.А., Шелгинский А.Я. Тепловые процессы и воздухораспределение в машинном зале высоковольтной канализационной насосной станции // Вестник МЭИ. 2025. № 4. С. 94—103. DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2025-4-94-103
---
Конфликт интересов: авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
#
1. Short M.D., Daikeler A., Wallis K., Peirson W.L., Peters G.M. Dissolved Methane in the Influent of Three Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants Fed by Gravity Sewers. Sci. Total Environment. 2017;599:85—93.
2. Matos R.V., Ferreira F., Gil C., Matos J.S. Understanding the Effect of Ventilation, Intermittent Pumping and Seasonality in Hydrogen Sulfide and Methane Concentrations in a Coastal Sewerage System. Environmental Sci. and Pollution Research. 2019;26(4):3404—3414.
3. Hamer G., Levi B., Lynch D., Wotten M., Mountford K. Brooklyn Trunk Sewer Long Term Investment Plan. Odors and Air Pollutants. 2023. Proc. of Water Environment Federation Conf. 2023.
4. Yang Z., Zhu D.Z., Yu T., Edwin-Bonsu S., Liu Y. Case Study of Sulfide Generation and Emission in Sanitary Sewer with Drop Structures and Pumping Station. Water Sci. and Technol. 2019;79(9):1685—1694.
5. Jia M., Zhang J., Xu Y. Optimization Design if Industrial Water Supply Pump Station Considering the Influence of Atmospheric Temperature on Operation Cost. IEEE Access. 2020;8:161702—161712.
6. Kruglikova A.V. Influence of Climate on the Operation of Sewage Treatment Facilities in Novosibirsk. Water and Ecology. 2020;82(2):37—44.
7. Ponizovskiy A., Gosteev S., Kuzhel O. The Study of Low Temperature Plasma of Pulse Discharge in Relation to Air Cleaning Units. J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2017;927:012043.
8. Weng L. e. a. Application Research of Pulsed Plasma Discharge Combined Technology for the Treatment of Malodorous Gas in Sewage Pumping Station. Proc. III Power System and Green Energy Conf. 2023:889—894.
9. Möller E., Pensler T., Thamsen P.U. Effect of Speed Variation on Clogging of Sewage Pumps. American Soc. Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting N.-Y., 2021;2:V002T00A001.
10. Rinas M., Tränckner J., Koegst T. Sedimentation of Raw Sewage: Investigations for a Pumping Station in Northern Germany under Energy-efficient Pump Control. Water. 2018;11(1):40.
11. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Predictive Control of a Variable-speed Multi-pump Motor Drive. IEEE Intern. Symp. Industrial Electronics. 2014:1409—1414.
12. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Optimization of Method of Adjustment of Productivity of Multi-pump System Containing Directly Connected Motors. Proc. IX Intern. Electric Power Quality and Supply Reliability Conf. 2014:209—214.
13. Bakman I., Gevorkov L. Speed Control Strategy Selection For Multi-Pump Systems. Proc. 56th Intern. Sci. Conf. Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Techn. University. 2015:7343174.
14. Burian S.O. e. a. Energy-efficient Control of Pump Units Based on Neural-network Parameter Observer. Techn. Electrodynamics. 2020;1:71—77.
15. Heckman E.L., Schafer P.L., Wolstenholme P., Pustorino R.E., Varma A. Pumping Station Design. N.-Y.: Elsevier, 2008:23.1—23.5.
16. Masud M.F., Chattopadhyay G., Gunawan I. Development of a Risk-based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for Sewage Pumping Station Network. Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. Industrial Eng. and Engineering Management. 2019:455—458.
17. Gromov G.N., Primin O.G. Use of Genetic Algorithms for Calibration of Hydraulic Models of Water Supply Systems. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;456:012108.
18. Chennaif M. e. a. Autonomous Solar Photovoltaic/battery System for the Electrification of Wastewater Pumping Stations. Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2023;954:861—872.
19. Chennaif M., Zahboune H., Elhafyani M.L., Zouggar S. Techno-economic Sizing of a Stand-alone Hybrid Energy and Storage for Water Pumping System. Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2019;684:291—299.
20. Venkatesh G. Systems Performance Analysis of Oslo's Water and Wastewater System. Trondheim, 2011.
21. Biktasheva L.F., Vadulina N.V. Development of the Methodology for a Biological Factor Assessment Considering Occupational Risks (Using the Example of Employees of the Treatment Plants). Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021;4:83—86.
22. Alikbayeva L.A. e. a. Hygienic Assessment of Conditions of the Exploitation of Facilities of the Urban Drainage System. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2016;95(12):1121—1124.
23. Khavanov P., Volkov V. Ensuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Friendliness of the Ventilation Systems with Baths Wastewater Treatment. Intern. Multi-Conf. Industrial Eng. and Modern Technol. 2019:8934406.
24. Oblienko A.V., Potapova S.O., Sushko E.A. Experimental Investigation of Explosive and Flammable Substances Distribution in Industrial Premises. Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2010;19(3):154—163.
25. Dement’eva M.E., Kurokhtin A.A. Features of Operation of Sewage Pumping Stations of Heat and Power Stations in Conditions the Far North. Proc. Moscow State University of Civil Engi. 2019;126(3):356—366.
26. Razakov M. Features of Providing Air Temperature and Humidity Parameters in the Engine Room Working Area at Sewage Pumping Stations. Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2024;2(74):28—39.
27. Prokhorov V., Rymarov A., Razakov M., Kosarev A. Specialized Method of Calculating Heat Input from Wastewater in the Premises of the Sewage Pumping Stations. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;463(3):032073.
28. Starkova L.G., Datsuk T.A., Ulyasheva V.M. Numerical Simulation of Aeration in a Hot Rolling Workshop. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022;94(5):76—82.
29. Tabunshchikov I.A., Kolubkov A.N., Brodach M.M., Avakian I.S. Calculating Airflow Rates, Cooling Loads in Commercial Kitchens. ASHRAE J. 2020;62(9):48—50.
30. Grimitlin A.M., Strongin A.S. Assessment of the Efficiency of the Use of Activating Turbulent Jets to Eliminate the Risk of the Formation of Unventilated Zones in Large Premises. J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2021;2131(1):052068.
31. Kostin V.I., Pozin G.M., Khomlyaskiy A.B. An Approximate Mathematical Model of Thermal and Air Processes in Power Plants Engine Rooms. News of Universities. Building and Architecture Ser. 1985;12:83—86.
32. Sargsyan S., Zhila V. Mathematical Modeling of the Indoor Ice Arena with Two Control Volumes for Calculation of the Air Exchange. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;365(2):022059.
33. Tabunshchikov Yu.A., Brodach M.M. Optimization Problems of Mathematical Modelling of a Building as a Unified Heat and Power System. Intern. J. Computational Civil and Structural Eng. 2020;16(1):156—161.
34. Titkov D., Yarkov I. A Mathematical Model for the Calculation of the Thermal Regime of the Underground Tunnel. Matec Web of Conf. 2018;251:03009
---
For citation: Razakov M.A., Shelginsky A.Ya. Thermal Processes and Air Distribution in the Engine Room of a High-voltage Sewage Pumping Station. Bulletin of MPEI. 2025;4:94—103. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2025-4-94-103
---
Conflict of interests: the authors declare no conflict of interest
2. Matos R.V., Ferreira F., Gil C., Matos J.S. Understanding the Effect of Ventilation, Intermittent Pumping and Seasonality in Hydrogen Sulfide and Methane Concentrations in a Coastal Sewerage System // Environmental Sci. and Pollution Research. 2019. V. 26(4). Pp. 3404—3414.
3. Hamer G., Levi B., Lynch D., Wotten M., Mountford K. Brooklyn Trunk Sewer Long Term Investment Plan // Odors and Air Pollutants. 2023. Proc. of Water Environment Federation Conf. 2023.
4. Yang Z., Zhu D.Z., Yu T., Edwin-Bonsu S., Liu Y. Case Study of Sulfide Generation and Emission in Sanitary Sewer with Drop Structures and Pumping Station // Water Sci. and Technol. 2019. V. 79(9). Pp. 1685—1694.
5. Jia M., Zhang J., Xu Y. Optimization Design if Industrial Water Supply Pump Station Considering the Influence of Atmospheric Temperature on Operation Cost // IEEE Access. 2020. V. 8. Pp. 161702—161712.
6. Kruglikova A.V. Influence of Climate on the Operation of Sewage Treatment Facilities in Novosibirsk // Water and Ecology. 2020. V. 82(2). Pp. 37—44.
7. Ponizovskiy A., Gosteev S., Kuzhel O. The Study of Low Temperature Plasma of Pulse Discharge in Relation to Air Cleaning Units // J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2017. V. 927. P. 012043.
8. Weng L. e. a. Application Research of Pulsed Plasma Discharge Combined Technology for the Treatment of Malodorous Gas in Sewage Pumping Station // Proc. III Power System and Green Energy Conf. 2023. Pp. 889—894.
9. Möller E., Pensler T., Thamsen P.U. Effect of Speed Variation on Clogging of Sewage Pumps // American Soc. Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting N.-Y., 2021. V. 2. P. V002T00A001.
10. Rinas M., Tränckner J., Koegst T. Sedimentation of Raw Sewage: Investigations for a Pumping Station in Northern Germany under Energy-efficient Pump Control // Water. 2018. V. 11(1). P. 40.
11. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Predictive Control of a Variable-speed Multi-pump Motor Drive // IEEE Intern. Symp. Industrial Electronics. 2014. Pp. 1409—1414.
12. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Optimization of Method of Adjustment of Productivity of Multi-pump System Containing Directly Connected Motors // Proc. IX Intern. Electric Power Quality and Supply Reliability Conf. 2014. Pp. 209—214.
13. Bakman I., Gevorkov L. Speed Control Strategy Selection For Multi-Pump Systems // Proc. 56th Intern. Sci. Conf. Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Techn. University. 2015. P. 7343174.
14. Burian S.O. e. a. Energy-efficient Control of Pump Units Based on Neural-network Parameter Observer // Techn. Electrodynamics. 2020. V. 1. Pp. 71—77.
15. Heckman E.L., Schafer P.L., Wolstenholme P., Pustorino R.E., Varma A. Pumping Station Design. N.-Y.: Elsevier, 2008. Pp. 23.1—23.5.
16. Masud M.F., Chattopadhyay G., Gunawan I. Development of a Risk-based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for Sewage Pumping Station Network // Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. Industrial Eng. and Engineering Management. 2019. Pp. 455—458.
17. Gromov G.N., Primin O.G. Use of Genetic Algorithms for Calibration of Hydraulic Models of Water Supply Systems // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 456. P. 012108.
18. Chennaif M. e. a. Autonomous Solar Photovoltaic/battery System for the Electrification of Wastewater Pumping Stations // Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2023. V. 954. Pp. 861—872.
19. Chennaif M., Zahboune H., Elhafyani M.L., Zouggar S. Techno-economic Sizing of a Stand-alone Hybrid Energy and Storage for Water Pumping System // Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2019. V. 684. Pp. 291—299.
20. Venkatesh G. Systems Performance Analysis of Oslo's Water and Wastewater System. Trondheim, 2011.
21. Biktasheva L.F., Vadulina N.V. Development of the Methodology for a Biological Factor Assessment Considering Occupational Risks (Using the Example of Employees of the Treatment Plants) // Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021. V. 4. Pp. 83—86.
22. Alikbayeva L.A. e. a. Hygienic Assessment of Conditions of the Exploitation of Facilities of the Urban Drainage System // Hygiene and Sanitation. 2016. V. 95(12). Pp. 1121—1124.
23. Khavanov P., Volkov V. Ensuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Friendliness of the Ventilation Systems with Baths Wastewater Treatment // Intern. Multi-Conf. Industrial Eng. and Modern Technol. 2019. P. 8934406.
24. Oblienko A.V., Potapova S.O., Sushko E.A. Experimental Investigation of Explosive and Flammable Substances Distribution in Industrial Premises // Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2010. V. 19(3). Pp. 154—163.
25. Dement’eva M.E., Kurokhtin A.A. Features of Operation of Sewage Pumping Stations of Heat and Power Stations in Conditions the Far North // Proc. Moscow State University of Civil Engi. 2019. V. 126(3). Pp. 356—366.
26. Razakov M. Features of Providing Air Temperature and Humidity Parameters in the Engine Room Working Area at Sewage Pumping Stations // Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2024. V. 2(74). Pp. 28—39.
27. Prokhorov V., Rymarov A., Razakov M., Kosarev A. Specialized Method of Calculating Heat Input from Wastewater in the Premises of the Sewage Pumping Stations // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 463(3). P. 032073.
28. Starkova L.G., Datsuk T.A., Ulyasheva V.M. Numerical Simulation of Aeration in a Hot Rolling Workshop // Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022. V. 94(5). Pp. 76—82.
29. Tabunshchikov I.A., Kolubkov A.N., Brodach M.M., Avakian I.S. Calculating Airflow Rates, Cooling Loads in Commercial Kitchens // ASHRAE J. 2020. V. 62(9). Pp. 48—50.
30. Grimitlin A.M., Strongin A.S. Assessment of the Efficiency of the Use of Activating Turbulent Jets to Eliminate the Risk of the Formation of Unventilated Zones in Large Premises // J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2021. V. 2131(1). P. 052068.
31. Kostin V.I., Pozin G.M., Khomlyaskiy A.B. An Approximate Mathematical Model of Thermal and Air Processes in Power Plants Engine Rooms // News of Universities. Building and Architecture Ser. 1985. V. 12. Pp. 83—86.
32. Sargsyan S., Zhila V. Mathematical Modeling of the Indoor Ice Arena with Two Control Volumes for Calculation of the Air Exchange // IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018. V. 365(2). P. 022059.
33. Tabunshchikov Yu.A., Brodach M.M. Optimization Problems of Mathematical Modelling of a Building as a Unified Heat and Power System // Intern. J. Computational Civil and Structural Eng. 2020. V. 16(1). Pp. 156—161.
34. Titkov D., Yarkov I. A Mathematical Model for the Calculation of the Thermal Regime of the Underground Tunnel // Matec Web of Conf. 2018. V. 251. P. 03009.
---
Для цитирования: Разаков М.А., Шелгинский А.Я. Тепловые процессы и воздухораспределение в машинном зале высоковольтной канализационной насосной станции // Вестник МЭИ. 2025. № 4. С. 94—103. DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2025-4-94-103
---
Конфликт интересов: авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов
#
1. Short M.D., Daikeler A., Wallis K., Peirson W.L., Peters G.M. Dissolved Methane in the Influent of Three Australian Wastewater Treatment Plants Fed by Gravity Sewers. Sci. Total Environment. 2017;599:85—93.
2. Matos R.V., Ferreira F., Gil C., Matos J.S. Understanding the Effect of Ventilation, Intermittent Pumping and Seasonality in Hydrogen Sulfide and Methane Concentrations in a Coastal Sewerage System. Environmental Sci. and Pollution Research. 2019;26(4):3404—3414.
3. Hamer G., Levi B., Lynch D., Wotten M., Mountford K. Brooklyn Trunk Sewer Long Term Investment Plan. Odors and Air Pollutants. 2023. Proc. of Water Environment Federation Conf. 2023.
4. Yang Z., Zhu D.Z., Yu T., Edwin-Bonsu S., Liu Y. Case Study of Sulfide Generation and Emission in Sanitary Sewer with Drop Structures and Pumping Station. Water Sci. and Technol. 2019;79(9):1685—1694.
5. Jia M., Zhang J., Xu Y. Optimization Design if Industrial Water Supply Pump Station Considering the Influence of Atmospheric Temperature on Operation Cost. IEEE Access. 2020;8:161702—161712.
6. Kruglikova A.V. Influence of Climate on the Operation of Sewage Treatment Facilities in Novosibirsk. Water and Ecology. 2020;82(2):37—44.
7. Ponizovskiy A., Gosteev S., Kuzhel O. The Study of Low Temperature Plasma of Pulse Discharge in Relation to Air Cleaning Units. J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2017;927:012043.
8. Weng L. e. a. Application Research of Pulsed Plasma Discharge Combined Technology for the Treatment of Malodorous Gas in Sewage Pumping Station. Proc. III Power System and Green Energy Conf. 2023:889—894.
9. Möller E., Pensler T., Thamsen P.U. Effect of Speed Variation on Clogging of Sewage Pumps. American Soc. Mechanical Engineers, Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting N.-Y., 2021;2:V002T00A001.
10. Rinas M., Tränckner J., Koegst T. Sedimentation of Raw Sewage: Investigations for a Pumping Station in Northern Germany under Energy-efficient Pump Control. Water. 2018;11(1):40.
11. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Predictive Control of a Variable-speed Multi-pump Motor Drive. IEEE Intern. Symp. Industrial Electronics. 2014:1409—1414.
12. Gevorkov L., Bakman I., Vodovozov V. Optimization of Method of Adjustment of Productivity of Multi-pump System Containing Directly Connected Motors. Proc. IX Intern. Electric Power Quality and Supply Reliability Conf. 2014:209—214.
13. Bakman I., Gevorkov L. Speed Control Strategy Selection For Multi-Pump Systems. Proc. 56th Intern. Sci. Conf. Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Techn. University. 2015:7343174.
14. Burian S.O. e. a. Energy-efficient Control of Pump Units Based on Neural-network Parameter Observer. Techn. Electrodynamics. 2020;1:71—77.
15. Heckman E.L., Schafer P.L., Wolstenholme P., Pustorino R.E., Varma A. Pumping Station Design. N.-Y.: Elsevier, 2008:23.1—23.5.
16. Masud M.F., Chattopadhyay G., Gunawan I. Development of a Risk-based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for Sewage Pumping Station Network. Proc. IEEE Intern. Conf. Industrial Eng. and Engineering Management. 2019:455—458.
17. Gromov G.N., Primin O.G. Use of Genetic Algorithms for Calibration of Hydraulic Models of Water Supply Systems. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;456:012108.
18. Chennaif M. e. a. Autonomous Solar Photovoltaic/battery System for the Electrification of Wastewater Pumping Stations. Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2023;954:861—872.
19. Chennaif M., Zahboune H., Elhafyani M.L., Zouggar S. Techno-economic Sizing of a Stand-alone Hybrid Energy and Storage for Water Pumping System. Lecture Notes in Electrical Eng. 2019;684:291—299.
20. Venkatesh G. Systems Performance Analysis of Oslo's Water and Wastewater System. Trondheim, 2011.
21. Biktasheva L.F., Vadulina N.V. Development of the Methodology for a Biological Factor Assessment Considering Occupational Risks (Using the Example of Employees of the Treatment Plants). Occupational Safety in Industry. 2021;4:83—86.
22. Alikbayeva L.A. e. a. Hygienic Assessment of Conditions of the Exploitation of Facilities of the Urban Drainage System. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2016;95(12):1121—1124.
23. Khavanov P., Volkov V. Ensuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Friendliness of the Ventilation Systems with Baths Wastewater Treatment. Intern. Multi-Conf. Industrial Eng. and Modern Technol. 2019:8934406.
24. Oblienko A.V., Potapova S.O., Sushko E.A. Experimental Investigation of Explosive and Flammable Substances Distribution in Industrial Premises. Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2010;19(3):154—163.
25. Dement’eva M.E., Kurokhtin A.A. Features of Operation of Sewage Pumping Stations of Heat and Power Stations in Conditions the Far North. Proc. Moscow State University of Civil Engi. 2019;126(3):356—366.
26. Razakov M. Features of Providing Air Temperature and Humidity Parameters in the Engine Room Working Area at Sewage Pumping Stations. Russian J. Building Construction and Architecture. 2024;2(74):28—39.
27. Prokhorov V., Rymarov A., Razakov M., Kosarev A. Specialized Method of Calculating Heat Input from Wastewater in the Premises of the Sewage Pumping Stations. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;463(3):032073.
28. Starkova L.G., Datsuk T.A., Ulyasheva V.M. Numerical Simulation of Aeration in a Hot Rolling Workshop. Bulletin of Civil Engineers. 2022;94(5):76—82.
29. Tabunshchikov I.A., Kolubkov A.N., Brodach M.M., Avakian I.S. Calculating Airflow Rates, Cooling Loads in Commercial Kitchens. ASHRAE J. 2020;62(9):48—50.
30. Grimitlin A.M., Strongin A.S. Assessment of the Efficiency of the Use of Activating Turbulent Jets to Eliminate the Risk of the Formation of Unventilated Zones in Large Premises. J. Phys.: Conf. Series. 2021;2131(1):052068.
31. Kostin V.I., Pozin G.M., Khomlyaskiy A.B. An Approximate Mathematical Model of Thermal and Air Processes in Power Plants Engine Rooms. News of Universities. Building and Architecture Ser. 1985;12:83—86.
32. Sargsyan S., Zhila V. Mathematical Modeling of the Indoor Ice Arena with Two Control Volumes for Calculation of the Air Exchange. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Sci. and Eng. 2018;365(2):022059.
33. Tabunshchikov Yu.A., Brodach M.M. Optimization Problems of Mathematical Modelling of a Building as a Unified Heat and Power System. Intern. J. Computational Civil and Structural Eng. 2020;16(1):156—161.
34. Titkov D., Yarkov I. A Mathematical Model for the Calculation of the Thermal Regime of the Underground Tunnel. Matec Web of Conf. 2018;251:03009
---
For citation: Razakov M.A., Shelginsky A.Ya. Thermal Processes and Air Distribution in the Engine Room of a High-voltage Sewage Pumping Station. Bulletin of MPEI. 2025;4:94—103. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2025-4-94-103
---
Conflict of interests: the authors declare no conflict of interest
Downloads
Published
2025-06-24
Issue
Section
Theoretical and Applied Heat Engineering (Technical Sciences) (2.4.6)
