Analysis of and Decision-Making on the Operational Reliability of Cyber-Physical Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24160/1993-6982-2023-3-154-162Keywords:
life cycle, cyber-physical system, operational reliability, decision-making, state graph diagramAbstract
Matters concerned with analyzing the operational reliability and recovery process of cyber-physical systems (CPS) are addressed. The proposed approach is based on dividing the CPS life cycle into time intervals with linking them to pre-emergency, emergency, restored and predicted states. The CPS serviceability is restored with respect to extremely critical and mission-critical equipment. In carrying out the analysis, graphs representing the states of cybernetic and physical components are introduced. Differential equations linking the probability of returning into a serviceable state with failure rates and restorations of various types are derived. The solution of the appropriate ordinary differential equations yields a clear graphical interpretation in the time domain and shows the changes in the probability with which the system components transfer from one state to another at different CPS life cycle time slices. By using the developed flow chart of making decisions on restoring or replacing the corresponding component, a reasonable choice can be made among possible options of actions aimed at restoring the serviceability of a multicomponent system. An algorithm for implementing the method has been developed and tested on a numerical example.
References
2. Antsaklis P. Goals and Сhallenges in Сyber-physical System Research Editorial of the Editor in Chitf // IEEE Trans. Automatic Control. 2014. V. 59(12). Pp. 2117—2119.
3. Jay Lee, Bagheri B., Hung-An Kao. Cyber-physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0 — Based Manufacturing Systems // Manufacturing Lett. 2015. V. 3. Pp. 18—23.
4. Jiafu Wan, Hehua Yan, Hui Suo, Fang Li. Advances in Cyber-physical Systems Research // KSII Trans. Internet and Information Syst. 2011. V. 5(11). Pp. 1891—1908.
5. Шубин Р.А. Надежность технических систем и техногенный риск. Тамбов: Изд-во ФГБОУ ВПО «TГTУ». 2012.
6. Хайкин С. Нейронные сети. М.: Вильямс, 2006.
7. Yilin Mo, Sinopoli B. On the Performance Degradation of Cyber-physical Systems Under Stealthy Integrity Attacks // IEEE Trans. Automatic Control. 2016. V. 61(9). Pp. 2618—2624.
8. Mitchell R., Ing-Ray Chen. Effect of Intrusion Detection and Response on Reliability of Cyber physical Systems // IEEE Trans. Reliability. 2013. V. 62(1). Pp. 199—210.
9. Черкесов Г. Методы и модели оценки живучести сложных систем. М.: Изд-во Знание, 1987.
10. Lei H., Sigh C., Sprintson A. Reliability Modeling and Analysis of IEC 61850 Based Substation Protection Systems // IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 2014. V. 5. No. 5. Pp. 2194—2202.
11. Шкляр В.Н. Надежность систем управления. Томск: Изд-во Томского политехн. ун-та, 2011.
12. Шихин В.А., Косинский М.Ю., Седлецкий Г.С. Методологические проблемы надежностного анализа в электросетевом комплексе в перспективе применения интеллектуальных моделей // Промышленная энергетика. 2015. № 5. С. 23—30.
---
Для цитирования: Обычайко Д.С., Шихин В.А. Анализ и принятие решений по эксплуатационной надежности киберфизических систем // Вестник МЭИ. 2023. № 3. С. 154—162. DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2023-3-154-162
#
1. Fei Hu e. a. Robust Cyber-physical Systems: Concept, Models, and Implementation. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2016;56:449—475.
2. Antsaklis P. Goals and Сhallenges in Сyber-physical System Research Editorial of the Editor in Chitf. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control. 2014;59(12):2117—2119.
3. Jay Lee, Bagheri B., Hung-An Kao. Cyber-physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0 — Based Manufacturing Systems. Manufacturing Lett. 2015;3:18—23.
4. Jiafu Wan, Hehua Yan, Hui Suo, Fang Li. Advances in Cyber-physical Systems Research. KSII Trans. Internet and Information Syst. 2011;5(11):1891—1908.
5. Shubin R.A. Nadezhnost' Tekhnicheskikh Sistem i Tekhnogennyy Risk. Tambov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «TGTU». 2012. (in Russian).
6. Khaykin S. Neyronnye Seti. M.: Vil'yams, 2006. (in Russian).
7. Yilin Mo, Sinopoli B. On the Performance Degradation of Cyber-physical Systems Under Stealthy Integrity Attacks. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control. 2016;61(9):2618—2624.
8. Mitchell R., Ing-Ray Chen. Effect of Intrusion Detection and Response on Reliability of Cyber physical Systems. IEEE Trans. Reliability. 2013;62(1):199—210.
9. Cherkesov G. Metody i Modeli Otsenki Zhivuchesti Slozhnykh Sistem. M.: Izd-vo Znanie, 1987. (in Russian).
10. Lei H., Sigh C., Sprintson A. Reliability Modeling and Analysis of IEC 61850 Based Substation Protection Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 2014;5;5:2194—2202.
11. Shklyar V.N. Nadezhnost' Sistem Upravleniya. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo Politekhn. Un-ta, 2011. (in Russian).
12. Shikhin V.A., Kosinskiy M.Yu., Sedletskiy G.S. Metodologicheskie Problemy Nadezhnostnogo Analiza v Elektrosetevom Komplekse v Perspektive Primeneniya Intellektual'nykh Modeley. Promyshlennaya Energetika. 2015;5:23—30. (in Russian).
---
For citation: Obychaiko D.S., Shikhin V.A. Analysis of and Decision-Making on the Operational Reliability of Cyber-Physical Systems. Bulletin of MPEI. 2023;3:154—162. (in Russian). DOI: 10.24160/1993-6982-2023-3-154-162
